|
|
 |
|
THE
SEATTLE POST-INTELLIGENCER
August 9, 2005, Tuesday
VOTING RIGHTS ISSUE HASN'T GONE AWAY
By: HELEN THOMAS, Syndicated columnist
There is apprehension among civil rights groups that
some key parts of the historic 1965 Voting Rights Act
may be diluted or eliminated when the law comes up for
renewal in 2007.
Some court rulings have weakened the law, which civil
rights leaders want to strengthen because they believe
voter discrimination continues.
Among possible targets for weakening is the law's requirement
that all or part of 16 states must get Justice Department
approval of any changes in their voting programs. This
pre-clearance rule applies to all the Southern states
and to parts of other states such as New York and South
Dakota.
In addition, the law requires that more than 450 counties
and townships provide language assistance to voters
with limited English skills.
States' rights supporters resent those federal oversight
requirements.
White House spokesman Scott McClellan said the administration
will work with Congress on legislation to renew the
law, but he has been vague on the touchy question of
whether President Bush would support the renewal of
the tough parts of law.
Those of us who want to protect the right to vote were
encouraged by remarks by Attorney General Alberto Gonzales
commemorating the 40th anniversary of the Voting Rights
Act at the Lyndon B. Johnson presidential library in
Austin, Texas, on Monday.
Johnson signed the bill, which was part of his Great
Society legislative program, shortly after the civil
rights march on Selma, Ala., where protesters were brutally
attacked by police. The law bans racial discrimination
nationwide in voting.
Gonzales praised it as "one of the most successful
pieces of civil rights legislation ever enacted."
Gonzales has said the Justice Department has set a goal
to "make voting easier and cheating harder."
The department currently has 124 election-fraud investigations
under way.
Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., chairman of the House
Judiciary Committee, said it was an "open question"
whether some sections of the act should be renewed.
Johnson did a lot of arm-twisting to win passage of
the legislation. But in stressing his civil rights agenda,
he alienated many of his Southern cronies in the Senate
where he had served as the majority leader.
In a visit to the Oval Office, one of those senators
chided Johnson: "When you were in the Senate, you
were a Southerner."
Johnson replied: "I'm president now, president
of all the people."
Before the law was passed, blacks were still fighting
for their voting rights that were thwarted by various
legal devices, including literacy tests and poll taxes.
Some potential black voters found themselves disenfranchised
because they could not recite the U.S. Constitution
or pay the poll tax.
Meantime, the Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights under
Law and other civil rights groups have created a National
Commission on the Voting Rights Act to establish a documented
record that shows discrimination continues.
The panel has been holding hearings to gather information
from citizens and government officials. The blue ribbon,
non-partisan panel held its first hearing in Selma last
March and has been holding sessions across the country
this summer.
Meanwhile, some lawmakers are concerned about memorandums
written by Supreme Court nominee John Roberts when he
was a Justice Department lawyer during the Reagan administration.
The memos defended the Reagan administration's opposition
to tougher provisions in the Voting Rights Act and show
that Roberts was trying to develop a more conservative
approach to civil rights.
Rep. John Lewis, D-Ga., a veteran of the civil rights
struggle, said Roberts should be grilled on his current
stand on that law during his confirmation hearings.
Jamin Raskin, a professor of constitutional law at American
University, says a "Right to Vote" constitutional
amendment is needed.
I believe that is long overdue.
Helen Thomas is a columnist for Hearst Newspapers. E-mail:
helent§hearstdc.com. Copyright 2005 Hearst Newspapers.
|
|
| |
|
 |
Southern
Regional Hearing
Montgomery, Alabama
March 11, 2005
Southwest
Regional Hearing
Phoenix, AZ
April 7, 2005
Northeast
Regional Hearing
New York, New York
June 14, 2005
Midwest
Regional Hearing
Minneapolis, Minnesota
July 22, 2005
South Georgia Hearing
Americus, Georgia
August 2, 2005
Florida
Hearing
Orlando, Florida
80th National Convention of the National Bar Association
August 4, 2005
South
Dakota Hearing
Rapid City, South Dakota
September 9, 2005
Western
Regional Hearing
Los Angeles, California
September 27, 2005
Mid-Atlantic
Regional Hearing
Washington, DC
October 14, 2005
Mississippi
Hearing
Jackson, Mississippi
October 29, 2005
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|