Transcript James Blacksher Written Testimony Orville Vernon Burton, Ph.D. Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Report of Dr. Orville Vernon Burton for Moultrie v. Charleston County Council, C.A., No. 9-01-562 11 Exhibit 2: Texas v. Conference of NAACP Branches, Voter Intimidation Hearing, City of Houston, Harris Co., TX; Fort Bend Co., TX, December 19th, 2000 Exhibit 3: Elections: Texas, Race Summary Report:1992 General Election; Travis Co. 1996 General Election; 2002 General Election; 2002 Republican Primary Election; 1994 General Election, 1994 General Election County by County Canvass Report; 1994 Democratic Primary Election Exhibit 4: NAACP Voter Irregularity Hearing, Harris Co., TX, December 12, 2001 Exhibit 5: NAACP Voter Intimidation Hearing, Dec. 9, 2000, Texarkana, TX Exhibit 6: Expert Report of Orville Vernon Burton, Ph.D. for Session v. Perry, regarding Congressional Redistricting in Texas, November 14, 2003 (Revised November 22, 2003) Exhibit 7: Report on South Carolina Legislative Delegation System for Vander Linden v. South Carolina, Civ. No. 2-92-3635-1 Raoul Cunningham Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Joseph Gerth, “Legislators may redraw 3 Louisville House Districts,” The Courier-Journal, February 2, 2002 Exhibit 2: Al Cross, “Aid blacks in redistricting, group urges,” The Courier- Journal, November 4, 2001 Exhibit 3: Memo from the Louisville and Jefferson County Branch of the NAACP re: Proposed Greater Louisville Council District Plan, July 20, 2001 Exhibit 4: NAACP Illustrative Charts: Kentucky House Districts Exhibit 5: NAACP Kentucky Letter to Hon. Jody Richards, House Speaker, concerning the February 2, 2002 Courier-Journal article, February 2, 2002 Exhibit 6: Memo from Samuel L. Waters, Redistricting Consultant with NAACP, re: NAACP Submission of Alternative Election Districts, July 2, 2001 Exhibit 7: Memo to Kentucky House of Representatives from NAACP re: Failure to Cure Vote Dilution Previously Identified in the Kentucky House Redistricting Plan, February 6, 2002 Exhibit 8: Raoul Cunningham, “Reconsider Redistricting,” The Courier-Journal, March 22, 2002 Exhibit 9: NAACP Comparison of KY House Plan Exhibit 10: Various newspaper articles on poll challenges Anita Earls Written Testimony Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Affidavit of Representative Thomas E. Wright, North Carolina v. Bartlett, 04 CVS 6966, General Court of Justice Superior Court Division Exhibit 2: Wright Affidavit, Attachment A. Exhibit 3: DOJ Letter re: Harnett Co., North Carolina, July 23, 2002 Exhibit 4: DOJ Letter to the Attorney General of North Carolina, February 3, 1997 Exhibit 5: Election Protection Draft Report of the University of North Carolina Center for Civil Rights, March 2005 Exhibit 6: Anita Earls, “Equal Effects,” Legal Affairs, November/December 2003, 22-23 Exhibit 7: Deposition of Kerry L. Haynie, Ph.D., Wake Co., North Carolina, Pender Co. v. Bartlett, No. 04-CvS-6966, General Court of Justice, Superior Court Div., Durham, NC, February 8, 2005 Exhibit 8: North Carolina Provisional Ballots Exhibit 9: Kerry L. Haynie, Ph.D., “Race and the Representation of Black Interests in State Legislatures,” Duke University, Undated Exhibit 10: Bratton and Haynie (1999), Table 1: Comparison of Black Interest Bill Introductions by Race, 1969, 1979 & 1989 Exhibit 11: Bratton and Haynie (1999), Table 2: Black Interest Bill Introductions as a Percentage of All Bill Introductions, 1969, 1979, 1989 Exhibit 12: Bratton and Haynie (1999), Table 3: Effects of Race on Bill Introductions Exhibit 13: Voter Registration by Race: North Carolina Statistics Report, October 2003 Exhibit 14: Racial Breakdown of Provisional Ballots Cast Out of Precinct, November 2, 2004 Richard Engstrom, Ph.D. Exhibits: Exhibit 1: Table 1: State House of Representatives Elections, Estimates Divisions in Support for African American Candidates Laughlin McDonald Written Testimony Exhibits: Exhibit 1: House Bill 168 of the Georgia General Assembly Exhibit 2: House Resolution 237 of the Georgia General Assembly Exhibit 3: Leatherman v. McConnell, CA 3:01-3609-10 Exhibit 4: Plaintiffs’ First Request for Judicial Notice, Levy v. Lexington Co, CA No. 3:03 3093 24 (D.S.C) Exhibit 5: Senate Bill 45 of the Georgia General Assembly Regional report